AI systems are becoming critical infrastructure. They make decisions, control processes, and handle sensitive data. That makes them targets. The AI security landscape is evolving rapidly.

I’ve been tracking AI-specific threats and the defenses emerging to counter them.

The Attack Surface Expands

AI introduces new vulnerabilities:

Model vulnerabilities: AI models can be manipulated in ways traditional software cannot.

Data poisoning: Corrupting training data to compromise model behavior.

Prompt injection: Manipulating AI systems through crafted inputs.

Model extraction: Stealing proprietary models through API probing.

Adversarial examples: Inputs designed to fool AI systems while appearing normal to humans.

Supply chain risks: Compromised pre-trained models, datasets, or libraries.

Traditional security approaches don’t fully address these AI-specific threats.

Prompt Injection: The Immediate Threat

Prompt injection has become the most discussed AI vulnerability:

Direct injection: Malicious instructions embedded in user input.

Indirect injection: Malicious content in data the AI processes (emails, documents, websites).

Jailbreaking: Bypassing AI safety measures through carefully crafted prompts.

Data exfiltration: Tricking AI into revealing sensitive information from its context.

Organizations deploying AI assistants and agents face immediate prompt injection risk.

Data Poisoning: The Training Threat

Training data can be compromised:

Backdoor attacks: Poisoning training data to create hidden triggers that cause malicious behavior.

Model degradation: Corrupting data to reduce model performance.

Bias injection: Introducing data that skews model outputs in desired directions.

Label manipulation: Changing ground truth labels to corrupt learning.

Organizations using public datasets or accepting user-generated training data face poisoning risk.

Model Theft and IP Protection

Proprietary AI models represent significant investment:

Query-based extraction: Reconstructing models through careful API probing.

Model inversion: Inferring training data from model outputs.

Side-channel attacks: Extracting model information through timing, power, or other side channels.

Insider theft: Traditional insider threat applied to model artifacts.

For organizations whose AI models are competitive advantages, protection is essential.

Adversarial Machine Learning

The academic field of adversarial ML has practical implications:

Evasion attacks: Inputs that fool deployed models (stop sign modifications fooling autonomous vehicles, for example).

Transferability: Attacks developed against one model often work against others.

Defense challenges: Robust defenses remain elusive. Arms race dynamics apply.

Applications in computer vision, fraud detection, and content moderation face adversarial risk.

Defensive Approaches

Organizations are developing AI security practices:

Input validation: Filtering and sanitizing inputs before AI processing. Essential for prompt injection defense.

Output monitoring: Detecting anomalous or potentially harmful AI outputs before delivery.

Red teaming: Proactively attacking AI systems to find vulnerabilities.

Model monitoring: Tracking model behavior for signs of drift, degradation, or manipulation.

Access controls: Limiting who can access AI systems and with what permissions.

Isolation: Separating AI systems from sensitive resources they don’t need to access.

Secure Development Practices

Building security into AI development:

Data provenance: Tracking training data sources and verifying integrity.

Model testing: Testing for adversarial robustness, not just accuracy.

Secure pipelines: Protecting ML training and deployment infrastructure.

Version control: Tracking model versions and ability to rollback.

Documentation: Recording model capabilities and limitations for security assessment.

Business AI solutions providers like Team400 increasingly emphasize security from the start. Building security in is far more effective than adding it later.

The Human Element

Technical defenses aren’t sufficient:

Awareness training: Users understanding AI system limitations and risks.

Social engineering: Attackers manipulating humans to compromise AI systems.

Incident response: Processes for detecting and responding to AI security incidents.

Governance: Policies defining acceptable AI use and security requirements.

Regulatory Landscape

AI security is becoming regulated:

EU AI Act: Requires security measures for high-risk AI systems.

Sector regulations: Financial services, healthcare adding AI security requirements.

Standard development: ISO, NIST developing AI security standards and frameworks.

Liability questions: Who’s responsible when AI security fails?

Organizations should anticipate increasing regulatory attention to AI security.

Emerging Threats

What’s coming:

AI-powered attacks: Using AI to generate more sophisticated attacks at scale.

Autonomous attack agents: AI systems conducting attacks with minimal human oversight.

Deepfakes at scale: AI-generated content for fraud, manipulation, and deception.

Model supply chain attacks: Compromising widely-used pre-trained models or libraries.

The offensive AI capability is developing alongside defensive measures.

My Assessment

AI security is becoming essential as AI becomes essential. The threat landscape is real and evolving. Organizations deploying AI need security strategies specifically addressing AI risks.

The good news: awareness is growing, tools are developing, and practices are maturing. The bad news: attackers are innovating too.

For organizations using AI, security can’t be an afterthought. Building secure AI systems, monitoring for threats, and preparing for incidents must be part of AI strategy from the beginning.

---

Analyzing the security challenges of AI systems and emerging defenses.