AI doesn’t just change technology strategy—it changes workforce strategy. How organizations plan for, develop, and deploy human talent must evolve alongside AI capabilities.

This is uncomfortable territory. Discussions about AI and jobs easily become politically charged. But workforce planning requires honest analysis.

The Planning Challenge

Traditional workforce planning assumes relatively stable task-to-job mappings. You know what work needs to be done, so you hire people to do it.

AI disrupts this assumption. The work that needs to be done is changing. The work that humans should do is changing. The skills required for human work are changing.

Planning in this environment requires thinking differently about several dimensions.

Task Analysis, Not Job Analysis

Jobs are bundles of tasks. AI affects tasks differently:

Tasks AI handles well:

• Routine cognitive work with clear patterns
• High-volume information processing
• Tasks with consistent inputs and measurable outputs
• Work that can be broken into discrete steps

Tasks AI handles poorly:

• Complex judgment requiring context
• Novel problem-solving
• Relationship-intensive work
• Tasks requiring physical presence and manipulation
• Highly creative or strategic work

Effective workforce planning analyzes how AI affects specific tasks within jobs, not jobs as monolithic units.

Transition Scenarios

Different roles face different AI transitions:

Augmentation: AI handles some tasks within a role; humans handle others. The role changes but persists. Most knowledge work will follow this pattern.

Restructuring: Roles fundamentally change. Tasks redistribute. New roles emerge that combine human and AI work differently.

Displacement: Some roles may become unnecessary as AI handles all their tasks. This is less common than feared but will occur in specific areas.

Creation: New roles emerge to build, manage, and work alongside AI systems. These didn’t exist before.

Workforce plans should account for all four scenarios across different parts of the organization.

Skill Evolution

The skills workforce planning should prioritize:

Increasing importance:

• Complex problem-solving and judgment
• Emotional intelligence and relationship skills
• Creativity and original thinking
• AI collaboration and oversight
• Strategic thinking and decision-making
• Cross-functional integration

Decreasing importance:

• Routine cognitive tasks
• Basic data processing and analysis
• Template-based work
• Simple information retrieval
• Rule-following without judgment

Hiring profiles, development programs, and performance evaluation should shift accordingly.

Timeline Considerations

Workforce transition takes time:

Technology moves faster than organizations: AI capabilities advance faster than organizations can absorb changes.

Skills take years to develop: Training people for new work requires sustained investment.

Culture changes slowly: Attitudes toward AI and new ways of working evolve gradually.

Regulatory constraints exist: Labor laws, union agreements, and other constraints affect how quickly workforces can change.

Plans should account for these different timelines, not assume instantaneous transition.

Retraining vs Hiring

Organizations face choices about how to acquire new skills:

Retraining advantages:

• Preserves organizational knowledge
• Maintains culture and relationships
• May be legally or ethically required
• Often more cost-effective than turnover

Retraining challenges:

• Not all employees can or want to transition
• Takes significant time and investment
• Diverts attention from current work
• May not reach required skill levels

Hiring advantages:

• Immediately acquires needed skills
• Brings fresh perspectives
• Faster for large skill gaps
• May be necessary for specialized AI skills

Hiring challenges:

• Expensive in competitive AI talent market
• Integration and culture challenges
• Loss of organizational knowledge
• May damage trust with existing employees

Most organizations need both. The mix depends on skill gaps, timelines, and organizational context.

Communication Challenges

Discussing AI’s workforce impact requires careful communication:

Acknowledge uncertainty: Predictions about AI job impact vary widely. Acknowledge what we don’t know.

Be honest about impact: Pretending AI won’t change jobs destroys trust when changes occur.

Emphasize opportunity alongside challenge: AI creates new possibilities, not just threats.

Provide agency: Help people understand how to prepare rather than feeling helpless.

Avoid both hype and doom: Neither “AI will take all jobs” nor “AI changes nothing” serves people well.

Scenario Planning

Given uncertainty, scenario planning helps:

Optimistic scenario: AI augments work; productivity gains expand opportunity; transitions are gradual and manageable.

Pessimistic scenario: AI displaces significant work; transitions are rapid and disruptive; inequality increases.

Most likely scenario: Something in between; varies significantly by role, industry, and organization.

Plans should be robust across scenarios, not optimized for any single prediction.

Practical Steps

Concrete actions organizations can take:

Conduct task-level analysis: Understand how AI affects specific tasks across the organization.

Identify priority transitions: Which roles face the most significant changes? Start planning there.

Invest in learning infrastructure: Build capacity for ongoing skill development. This is a permanent need, not a one-time program.

Create transition pathways: Define how people can move from current roles to future roles.

Experiment with new models: Pilot new human-AI work configurations before broad deployment.

Monitor and adjust: Track how AI actually affects work and adjust plans accordingly.

My View

AI will change work significantly. But change is not the same as elimination. Most human work will evolve rather than disappear.

Organizations that plan thoughtfully for this evolution—investing in their people, creating transition pathways, and adapting their workforce strategies—will navigate the transition better than those that either ignore it or panic.

The workforce of the future will be different. Workforce planning should start building that future now.

---

Analyzing AI’s implications for workforce planning and human capital strategy.