AI agents in production behave differently than AI agents in testing. The controlled conditions of development give way to the chaos of real-world operation.

Organizations running agents at scale are accumulating hard-won lessons about reliability.

The Reliability Gap

Testing environments underestimate production challenges:

Input variation: Real users provide inputs more diverse and unexpected than test cases anticipate.

System dependencies: Production systems have outages, slowdowns, and unexpected behaviors that agents must handle.

Scale effects: Issues that appear at scale—rate limits, resource exhaustion, race conditions—are invisible in testing.

Time dynamics: Agent behavior may change over time as contexts accumulate, models update, or data drifts.

Edge case accumulation: Low-probability events become certainties at sufficient volume.

The gap between test performance and production performance consistently surprises teams.

Common Failure Modes

Production agents fail in predictable patterns:

Context overflow: Agents accumulate context until they exceed limits, then fail unpredictably.

Tool failures: External APIs and systems fail. Agents without robust error handling fail too.

Hallucination cascades: Small errors compound through agent reasoning, producing confidently wrong outputs.

Infinite loops: Agents get stuck in repetitive patterns, consuming resources without progress.

Unexpected inputs: User inputs outside anticipated patterns cause unpredictable behavior.

Model changes: Provider model updates subtly change behavior, breaking dependent logic.

Reliability Patterns That Work

Successful production deployments share approaches:

Aggressive timeouts: Bound agent operation time. Prefer fast failure to slow degradation.

Robust error handling: Every external call wrapped with retry logic and fallback behavior.

Context management: Explicit strategies for managing context window limits.

Output validation: Check agent outputs before acting on them. Catch errors early.

Graceful degradation: When things fail, fail safely. Preserve partial progress where possible.

Human escalation: Clear triggers for escalating to human operators when agents struggle.

Monitoring Requirements

Production agents need different monitoring than traditional applications:

Output quality metrics: Not just “did it run” but “did it produce good outputs.” This requires domain-specific evaluation.

Cost tracking: AI agents can become expensive quickly. Per-request and aggregate cost monitoring is essential.

Latency distribution: Average latency misleads. Track percentiles to understand user experience.

Error categorization: Different error types need different responses. Classify errors meaningfully.

Drift detection: Monitor for behavior changes over time, even when no errors occur.

Usage patterns: Understand how agents are actually used versus how they were designed to be used.

The Testing Challenge

Traditional testing approaches don’t fully address agent reliability:

Non-deterministic outputs: The same input produces different outputs. Test assertions become probabilistic.

Evaluation difficulty: Determining whether an output is “correct” requires judgment, not just comparison.

Coverage limitations: The input space is effectively infinite. No test suite covers all cases.

Simulation limits: Test environments can’t fully simulate production complexity.

Effective approaches include:

• Property-based testing focusing on output characteristics rather than exact matches
• Golden set evaluation with human-labeled examples
• Shadow mode running parallel to production for comparison
• Continuous production evaluation, not just pre-deployment testing

Operational Practices

Teams operating agents successfully:

Gradual rollout: New agents start with limited traffic, expanding based on performance.

Automatic rollback: Poor performance triggers automatic reversion to previous versions.

Incident playbooks: Documented procedures for common failure scenarios.

Regular review: Periodic analysis of agent outputs beyond automated monitoring.

Feedback integration: Systematic capture and incorporation of correction feedback.

Chaos engineering: Deliberately inducing failures to verify resilience.

The Human-in-the-Loop Balance

Reliability often depends on appropriate human involvement:

Too much automation: Agents make mistakes without correction. Errors accumulate.

Too much human involvement: Defeats the purpose of automation. Doesn’t scale.

Right balance: Humans handle high-stakes decisions and edge cases. Agents handle volume.

Finding this balance requires experimentation and adjustment. It varies by use case and matures over time as agent capabilities improve.

Cost of Reliability

Reliability requires investment:

Engineering time: Building robust agents takes longer than building working prototypes.

Infrastructure cost: Monitoring, fallbacks, and redundancy add expense.

Operational overhead: Managing production agents requires ongoing attention.

Opportunity cost: Time spent on reliability isn’t spent on new features.

These costs are real but almost always worthwhile. The cost of unreliable agents—failed processes, unhappy users, reputation damage—exceeds reliability investments.

Maturity Model

Agent operations mature through stages:

Stage 1—Experimental: Agents run with constant human supervision. Limited scope.

Stage 2—Supervised: Agents handle routine cases autonomously. Humans review exceptions.

Stage 3—Managed: Comprehensive monitoring and alerting. Humans respond to alerts.

Stage 4—Self-healing: Systems detect and correct many problems automatically. Humans handle escalations.

Most organizations are in stages 1-2. Stage 4 is aspirational but achievable with investment.

My Perspective

AI agent reliability in production is a solvable problem, but it requires deliberate engineering. The same agent code can be reliable or unreliable depending on how it’s deployed and operated.

Organizations should expect to invest significantly in reliability engineering for production agents. This investment pays off in agents that actually deliver sustained value rather than impressive demos that disappoint in practice.

---

Documenting what production AI agent operations reveal about reliability engineering.