A new category is emerging in the AI services landscape: the AI agency. These firms operate differently from traditional consultants, system integrators, or software vendors.

Understanding this model helps organizations choose the right partners for AI initiatives.

What Defines an AI Agency

AI agencies share common characteristics:

Outcome focus: They’re hired to deliver working AI systems, not recommendations or strategies.

Technical depth: Teams are primarily engineers and data scientists, not consultants or project managers.

Speed orientation: Engagements are shorter and more focused than traditional consulting projects.

Iterative delivery: Working software ships early and improves continuously, rather than following waterfall methodology.

Productized services: Common deliverables are packaged into repeatable offerings rather than fully custom each time.

This model differs significantly from traditional consulting.

How It Differs from Consulting

Traditional consulting emphasizes analysis, strategy, and recommendations. Consultants study problems, present options, and advise on decisions. Implementation often involves separate teams or vendors.

An Australian AI company like Team400 emphasizes execution. The same team that understands your problem builds the solution. Strategy emerges from building rather than preceding it.

The tradeoffs are real:

Consulting advantages: Broader perspective, organizational change management expertise, executive communication skills, established enterprise relationships.

Agency advantages: Faster delivery, deeper technical capability, lower overhead, more direct accountability for results.

The Economics

AI agency economics differ from consulting:

Pricing models: Agencies often work on fixed-price projects or value-based arrangements rather than time-and-materials billing.

Team structures: Smaller teams with higher technical skill density. Less hierarchy, fewer coordinators.

Overhead: Lower operational costs than large consultancies enable more competitive pricing.

Scope management: Tighter scope definition upfront. Less accommodation of evolving requirements mid-project.

Typical engagement costs range from $50,000 for focused projects to $500,000+ for complex implementations—generally lower than equivalent consulting engagements.

When Agencies Excel

The AI agency model works best when:

The problem is well-defined: Clear use case, known data sources, understood success criteria.

Speed matters: The organization needs working AI quickly rather than extensive planning.

Technical capability is the constraint: The organization knows what to build but lacks internal expertise.

Budget is fixed: The project needs to deliver within defined investment limits.

Integration scope is bounded: The AI system doesn’t require transforming entire enterprise architectures.

When Agencies Struggle

The model has limitations:

Organizational complexity: AI agencies typically don’t do change management. If the organization isn’t ready to adopt AI, technical delivery alone won’t succeed.

Unclear requirements: Agencies need defined problems. Extended discovery and requirements definition isn’t their strength.

Enterprise politics: Navigating complex stakeholder environments requires skills agencies may not prioritize.

Ongoing operations: Some agencies focus on building, not running. Ensure operational support is addressed.

Scale projects: Very large implementations may exceed agency capacity.

Evaluating AI Agencies

When considering AI agency partners:

Review actual work: Ask for case studies and references. See working systems they’ve built.

Assess technical depth: Talk to the engineers. Evaluate whether they understand cutting-edge AI, not just application development.

Understand scope management: How do they handle requirements that emerge during development?

Clarify ownership: Who owns the code, models, and data? What happens after engagement ends?

Check operational handoff: How will they transfer knowledge and systems to your team?

The Hybrid Approach

Many organizations use agencies alongside traditional resources:

• Internal teams handle strategy and requirements definition
• Agencies build and deploy AI systems
• Consultants manage organizational change
• Internal operations takes over maintenance

This hybrid model captures benefits of each approach while managing their limitations.

Market Evolution

The AI agency landscape is evolving:

Specialization increasing: Generalist AI agencies give way to vertical specialists focused on specific industries or use cases.

Platform partnerships forming: Agencies align with specific AI platforms (OpenAI, Anthropic, cloud providers) for deeper expertise.

Productization continuing: Common solutions become products; agencies focus on customization and integration.

Quality variance widening: As more firms enter the market, distinguishing quality becomes harder but more important.

My View

AI agencies fill an important gap in the market. Not every AI initiative requires the overhead of traditional consulting. Not every organization can build in-house capabilities.

The agency model provides a middle path: expert execution without bureaucratic weight.

The key is matching model to need. Complex, ambiguous, politically sensitive initiatives may warrant traditional consulting. Clear, bounded, technically challenging projects fit the agency model better.

Understanding this distinction helps organizations choose partners wisely.

---

Analyzing the emergence of AI agencies as a distinct service category.