The pace of AI advancement is accelerating. What took years now takes months. What took months now takes weeks.

This velocity creates both opportunity and challenge for organizations trying to build with AI.

The Acceleration Pattern

Consider the trajectory:

2022: GPT-3 represents state-of-the-art. Impressive but limited. Many tasks require significant prompt engineering and workarounds.

2023: GPT-4 arrives. Dramatic capability jump. Tasks impossible a year ago become routine.

2024: Multiple frontier models compete. Specialized models emerge for specific domains. Open source closes the gap with proprietary models.

Each generation arrives faster than the previous. The improvement curve is steepening, not flattening.

What’s Driving Acceleration

Several factors compound to accelerate progress:

Compute scaling: Training runs grow larger. More compute enables more capable models.

Data improvements: Better training data, more sophisticated data preparation, synthetic data generation.

Architecture innovations: Attention mechanisms, mixture of experts, and other architectural advances improve efficiency.

Research velocity: More researchers, more papers, faster knowledge diffusion.

Commercial incentives: Massive investment creates pressure to deliver results.

The feedback loops between these factors create compounding acceleration.

Implications for Organizations

This acceleration creates strategic challenges:

Technology debt accumulates quickly: AI systems built on last year’s capabilities may be obsolete. Continuous modernization becomes necessary.

Planning horizons compress: Long-term AI roadmaps become unreliable. What’s impossible today may be trivial in 18 months.

Investment timing matters more: Early investments in inferior technology may be wasted. Waiting too long cedes competitive ground.

Skill requirements shift: The skills needed to work with AI evolve rapidly. Training and hiring must keep pace.

Vendor relationships complicate: Committing to specific providers becomes riskier as competitive positions shift.

Strategic Responses

Organizations can respond to acceleration in several ways:

Embrace flexibility: Build AI systems with component modularity. Assume you’ll swap models and update approaches.

Focus on integration: Model capability improves regardless of what you do. Your competitive advantage lies in integrating AI with unique data, processes, and expertise.

Invest in talent: People who understand AI and can adapt to new developments are more valuable than specific technical skills that may become obsolete.

Maintain evaluation capability: Continuously test new models and approaches against your use cases. Don’t assume current choices remain optimal.

Accept experimentation: Treat AI investments as experiments rather than permanent decisions. Budget for learning and iteration.

The Abstraction Ladder

AI development is climbing an abstraction ladder:

Level 1 (2020-2022): Developers write prompts. Significant prompt engineering required for good results.

Level 2 (2023-2024): Frameworks abstract common patterns. RAG, agents, and other architectures become standardized.

Level 3 (emerging): AI builds AI applications. Agents generate prompts, construct pipelines, optimize systems.

Each level reduces the expertise required to build AI applications while enabling more sophisticated outcomes.

What To Watch

Key developments that will shape the next acceleration phase:

Reasoning capabilities: Current models are improving at multi-step reasoning. Continued progress here unlocks new application categories.

Multimodal integration: Text, image, audio, and video in unified models. This expands AI applicability significantly.

Agent reliability: As agents become more reliable for complex tasks, automation scope expands dramatically.

Cost reduction: Inference costs continue falling. Applications currently uneconomical become viable.

Regulation: Government responses to AI advancement may slow or redirect development in certain areas.

The Human Element

Amid technological acceleration, human factors remain critical:

Adoption lags capability: Organizations can absorb change only so fast. Technical possibility outpaces organizational readiness.

Trust takes time: Building confidence in AI systems requires experience and evidence. This can’t be rushed.

Skills require development: Training people to work effectively with AI doesn’t happen overnight.

Culture must evolve: Organizations built around human-only work must adapt their cultures, incentives, and structures.

The gap between what AI can do and what organizations actually do with AI will persist even as capabilities advance.

My Perspective

AI development velocity creates pressure to act but also risk from premature commitment.

The winning strategy balances engagement with flexibility: building AI capabilities that deliver value today while maintaining ability to adopt better approaches tomorrow.

This requires comfort with uncertainty and continuous learning. Organizations that can operate effectively in a rapidly changing landscape will outperform those seeking stable, permanent solutions.

The acceleration isn’t slowing. Adaptation is the only viable strategy.

---

Analyzing AI development velocity and its implications for organizational strategy.